President Trump has proposed the US government get a stake in TikTok. Legal analysts say it raises a bunch of questions ...

Can the federal government eliminate “diversity, equity, and inclusion” and “gender ideology” without violating civil rights?

Let’s pick up where we left off four weeks ago. In TikTok, Inc. v. Garland, the U.S. Supreme Court showed that when it really wants to move really fast, it really can. The plaintiffs-petitioners—whom ...

The latest turn in the ongoing saga over TikTok in the United States has brought the balance of power among the three ...

DeepSeek, the Chinese-owned ChatGPT rival, could pose the same national security concerns that Congress has about TikTok, ...

Congress voted to ban TikTok out of concern that TikTok's ownership structure represents a security risk, a ban upheld by the ...

Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech or of the press…” — First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ...

When Justice Douglas asked the government lawyer if the phrase "no law" in the First Amendment literally means no law, he was unable to answer. The court found his mumbo jumbo reasoning so telling ...

WASHINGTON (AP) — Perplexity AI has presented a new proposal to TikTok’s parent company that would allow the U.S. government ...